<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 20GB in 1980 VS 32GB in 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vincentchow.net/3862/20gb-in-1980-vs-32gb-in-2010/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vincentchow.net/3862/20gb-in-1980-vs-32gb-in-2010</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:16:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentchow.net/3862/20gb-in-1980-vs-32gb-in-2010#comment-246028</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentchow.net/?p=3862#comment-246028</guid>
		<description>i remember buying a 256k memory &#039;module&#039;  in 1982 - it was the size of a packet of cigarettes and it cost me $120  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i remember buying a 256k memory &#039;module&#039;  in 1982 &#8211; it was the size of a packet of cigarettes and it cost me $120</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HarrisonS</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentchow.net/3862/20gb-in-1980-vs-32gb-in-2010#comment-245711</link>
		<dc:creator>HarrisonS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 03:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentchow.net/?p=3862#comment-245711</guid>
		<description>Actually, silicone technology is going to reach its limit in a couple of years. Unless we find a better semiconductor, this shrinking process will cease. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, silicone technology is going to reach its limit in a couple of years. Unless we find a better semiconductor, this shrinking process will cease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: star fish</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentchow.net/3862/20gb-in-1980-vs-32gb-in-2010#comment-245273</link>
		<dc:creator>star fish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentchow.net/?p=3862#comment-245273</guid>
		<description>hologram...? can we achive that..? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hologram&#8230;? can we achive that..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentchow.net/3862/20gb-in-1980-vs-32gb-in-2010#comment-244939</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 05:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentchow.net/?p=3862#comment-244939</guid>
		<description>by the way where did you buy this and what brand/speed/class/category 
 
thanks </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by the way where did you buy this and what brand/speed/class/category </p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zen</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentchow.net/3862/20gb-in-1980-vs-32gb-in-2010#comment-244115</link>
		<dc:creator>Zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentchow.net/?p=3862#comment-244115</guid>
		<description>2080 it is free, lol </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2080 it is free, lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saf85</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentchow.net/3862/20gb-in-1980-vs-32gb-in-2010#comment-243924</link>
		<dc:creator>saf85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentchow.net/?p=3862#comment-243924</guid>
		<description>Pretty sure I read some where that eventually they will not be able to miniturise processors once they reach a certain point, since the electrons/neutrons will end up being too close to each other they collide etc. Probly have already reached that point if you ask me, since they just making quad core, 6 core, and soon 8 core processors and not really increasing the speeds, would indicate to me only way they can add more power is to add more processors, soon we will see processors growing in size I guess as they add more cores each 6 month cycle. guess same applies to solid state drives such as micro sd cards. So they will have to get biggesr eventually, maybe even scrap the whole micro sd idea and go to semi micro etc lol. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty sure I read some where that eventually they will not be able to miniturise processors once they reach a certain point, since the electrons/neutrons will end up being too close to each other they collide etc. Probly have already reached that point if you ask me, since they just making quad core, 6 core, and soon 8 core processors and not really increasing the speeds, would indicate to me only way they can add more power is to add more processors, soon we will see processors growing in size I guess as they add more cores each 6 month cycle. guess same applies to solid state drives such as micro sd cards. So they will have to get biggesr eventually, maybe even scrap the whole micro sd idea and go to semi micro etc lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentchow.net/3862/20gb-in-1980-vs-32gb-in-2010#comment-243820</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 16:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentchow.net/?p=3862#comment-243820</guid>
		<description>Why show 3 SD cards????  (And then claim &quot;only 1&quot; in the text.) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why show 3 SD cards????  (And then claim &quot;only 1&quot; in the text.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasmine</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentchow.net/3862/20gb-in-1980-vs-32gb-in-2010#comment-234417</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentchow.net/?p=3862#comment-234417</guid>
		<description>Such a huge change in a few decades time. But 32GB today is only good for a couple of HD movies. :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such a huge change in a few decades time. But 32GB today is only good for a couple of HD movies. <img src='http://www.vincentchow.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kwpang</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentchow.net/3862/20gb-in-1980-vs-32gb-in-2010#comment-220566</link>
		<dc:creator>kwpang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 07:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentchow.net/?p=3862#comment-220566</guid>
		<description>that is really big change in 30 years time, i remember i spent $250 for 6gb hdd and now a 32gb sd card only cost less than $40 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is really big change in 30 years time, i remember i spent $250 for 6gb hdd and now a 32gb sd card only cost less than $40</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baburhan Kokturk</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentchow.net/3862/20gb-in-1980-vs-32gb-in-2010#comment-214257</link>
		<dc:creator>Baburhan Kokturk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentchow.net/?p=3862#comment-214257</guid>
		<description>time goes by ... Thanks. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>time goes by &#8230; Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: www.vincentchow.net @ 2012-02-10 02:36:37 -->
