<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Much Are You Willing to Pay for WiMAX?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vincentchow.net/2258/how-much-are-you-willing-to-pay-for-wimax/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vincentchow.net/2258/how-much-are-you-willing-to-pay-for-wimax</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:16:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: arifz</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentchow.net/2258/how-much-are-you-willing-to-pay-for-wimax#comment-201123</link>
		<dc:creator>arifz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentchow.net/?p=2258#comment-201123</guid>
		<description>im using wimax with package 400kbps..but i only  get 30kbps </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im using wimax with package 400kbps..but i only  get 30kbps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentchow.net/2258/how-much-are-you-willing-to-pay-for-wimax#comment-101016</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentchow.net/?p=2258#comment-101016</guid>
		<description>At least it creates larger competition to Streamyx and hopefully they will try to improve themselves. But somehow Streamyx has very little downtime these days and I&#039;m happy with it as I don&#039;t have to ring their hell line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least it creates larger competition to Streamyx and hopefully they will try to improve themselves. But somehow Streamyx has very little downtime these days and I&#8217;m happy with it as I don&#8217;t have to ring their hell line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentchow.net/2258/how-much-are-you-willing-to-pay-for-wimax#comment-100756</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentchow.net/?p=2258#comment-100756</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t see that they can be any better than Streamyx - not that I am saying Streamyx is any good.

Presumably they will be tied into TM&#039;s backbone somewhere so eventually they will meet the same bottleneck that we already face.

Wireless networks will be the first to throttle their customers as the bandwidth of the air connection is limited. So, I doubt we will see any improvement over TM.

I already use 2 Streamyx lines &amp; Jaring wireless and will be the first to try these new offerings, but don&#039;t expect miracles of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see that they can be any better than Streamyx &#8211; not that I am saying Streamyx is any good.</p>
<p>Presumably they will be tied into TM&#8217;s backbone somewhere so eventually they will meet the same bottleneck that we already face.</p>
<p>Wireless networks will be the first to throttle their customers as the bandwidth of the air connection is limited. So, I doubt we will see any improvement over TM.</p>
<p>I already use 2 Streamyx lines &amp; Jaring wireless and will be the first to try these new offerings, but don&#8217;t expect miracles of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: www.vincentchow.net @ 2012-02-10 06:28:15 -->
